From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: new exporter and latex attributes
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:27:05 +0200
Message-ID: <87628cc7om.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20120820212833.GB66157@BigDog.local> <87y5l9cgym.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20120821005529.GB87759@BigDog.local> <25173.1345527256@alphaville>
	<20120821190812.GA95414@BigDog.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53571)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1T3v6G-00054L-ER
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:30:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1T3v6F-0000ZK-5j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:30:56 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:50749)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1T3v6E-0000Xs-VP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:30:55 -0400
Received: by weys10 with SMTP id s10so159298wey.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120821190812.GA95414@BigDog.local> (Rick Frankel's message of
	"Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:08:12 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com> writes:

> BUT, if the source block is not named then a duplicate results will be
> created above the current results block w/ the attribute header when
> the source block is re-evaluated.

That's correct.

For convenience, Babel might copy src-block attributes to the generated
results upon block evaluation. It would be strange though: do both
src-block and results have to share the same caption, the same label..?
We could limit copy to ATTR keywords, perhaps. I feel it's hackish,
though.

> I guess it's acceptable to require all source blocks to be named if
> you want to have header attributes associated with the generated
> results, but this is a significant incompatible change from the
> behavior of the current exporter...

There are a few incompatible changes, indeed. You can't make an omelette
without breaking eggs.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou