From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Org-mode release 7.9 Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 16:49:45 +0530 Message-ID: <87627nsasu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87sjbcb89x.fsf@altern.org> <87sjb9iqgp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <878vcylxi7.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <873935mvd9.fsf@altern.org> <20120829234032.GA27761@panix.com> <878vcxgcdz.fsf@altern.org> <87sjb4725t.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <878vcwmdne.fsf@gmx.com> <87fw73v74v.fsf@altern.org> <87pq67uev7.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87boho4ph2.fsf@altern.org> <87627n8owx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50479) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TAfXX-0008Lx-Kx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 07:19:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TAfXW-00073U-C1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 07:18:59 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:38669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TAfXW-00073P-6o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 07:18:58 -0400 Received: by iec9 with SMTP id 9so1665057iec.0 for ; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 04:18:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87627n8owx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Sun, 09 Sep 2012 12:35:10 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Bastien writes: >> Let's take the easy road then. > > I'll work on that in maint, is this OK? > >> I'd suggest org+ as the name of the package. > > Hmm=E2=80=A6 I'd rather avoid that since "+" is a reserved character in f= ile > names on some systems. How about orgplus? > >> Hosting it on something like orgmode.org/pkg/daily/elpa_ would=20 >> do I guess, then the ELPA servers would have to download it. > > What I don't know is how to make sure that only one of these packages > gets installed. It could become quite confusing if someone decides to > install both and have different versions of them. The package manager > knows to remove an older version of the same package, but I don't think > you can tell it to remove a different package, so we need to educate the > prospective user to do this. Suggestions? Package manager will download and upgrade the dependency if needed. Bundle the exporters in to say org-extras*.tar or org-devel-*.tar and then have that package depend on the right version of org-*.tar. We can provide different URLs for gnu and non-gnu packages. So that users will know what to test with more rigour. > Regards, > Achim. --=20