From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Remove dependency on latexsym
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 14:34:18 +0200
Message-ID: <8761uklnzp.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87y57zouv5.fsf@gmx.us> <87pptat5zf.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87bo4dkfwi.fsf@gmx.us> <87zjrxj0j2.fsf_-_@gmx.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32900)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VG6r6-0004gc-LG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 08:34:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VG6r0-0001Pz-Qc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 08:34:12 -0400
Received: from mail-ea0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::233]:65223)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VG6r0-0001Pv-JD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 08:34:06 -0400
Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b10so1767934eae.24
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 05:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87zjrxj0j2.fsf_-_@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sat, 31
	Aug 2013 18:19:29 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> It's easy to remove the decency of latexsym as it only defines a very
> limited number of symbols (see texdoc latexsym).  Using amssymb
> symbols will even look better IMO, but check this document:

[...]


> Obviously, it requires the removal of Diamond (my entity patch) and
> Box (this patch)

Applied. Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou