From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: words starting with call_ confuse C-c C-c and export
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:12:39 -0700
Message-ID: <8761r14cjr.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87ob4ytoqf.wl%n142857@gmail.com> <87zjohvem7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87iov16b3d.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqjhu5i1.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39083)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Vp7gh-0003HG-8l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:32:16 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Vp7gc-0000dl-0d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:32:11 -0500
Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]:55137)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Vp7gb-0000da-PF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:32:05 -0500
Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id v10so2000942pde.13
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:32:04 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> We may tweak `org-babel-inline-lob-one-liner-regexp' in order to make it
>>> harder to trigger it unwillingly. 
>>>
>>
>> The trade-off here is between raising an error when e.g., a like
>> matching the call line syntax has a problem or failing silently.  The
>> former is preferable in the case where you intend the syntax to be a
>> call and you *do* want to know if there is a problem, and the latter is
>> preferable if you aren't trying to issue a call and just stumbled upon
>> the syntax.
>>
>> I'm open to either solution, it's just a question of which use case is
>> more important and which failure condition is more onerous.
>
> Just to be clear, I thought about making parens mandatory in inline
> Babel call syntax. Underscore is overloaded already: underline,
> subscript...
>

I'm open to this change.

-- 
Eric Schulte
https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
PGP: 0x614CA05D