From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtPVF0gQSBuZXcgd2ViIGJyb3dzZXLigL0=?= Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:21:23 +0200 Message-ID: <8760vq50d8.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87potzvlp0.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpo7a56g.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57849) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aotlc-00058Z-0o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:21:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aotlX-0004lw-V0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:21:39 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43149) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aotlX-0004jQ-Og for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:21:35 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aotlU-00008G-Tb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:21:32 +0200 Received: from ip-37-201-6-198.hsi13.unitymediagroup.de ([37.201.6.198]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:21:32 +0200 Received: from rasmus by ip-37-201-6-198.hsi13.unitymediagroup.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:21:32 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Adam Porter writes: > >> Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: >> >>> https://vivaldi.com/ >>> >>> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes >>> while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? >>> Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or >>> (hopefully) configurable ones. I, for one, would like to try it out, >>> though I do not have too high hopes. >> >> It looks interesting, but it's not free software, so I have no interest >> myself. Firefox/Iceweasel has been serving me well since before it was >> Firefox, and Pentadactyl has been my primary UI to it for a long time. I >> don't feel like Mozilla is taking it in a good direction anymore, but if it >> ever gets too bad, there's Iceweasel, and there's Pale Moon (which has >> committed to "classic" Firefox extension APIs and UI), and there are other >> alternatives like Conkeror, uzbl, etc. >> >> Even if you don't care about free software, Vivaldi is made by former Opera >> devs, so how do we know they aren't just repeating a cycle? It could go the >> same direction Opera went and need to be rebooted again. As long as it's >> proprietary, that's a risk its users will always face. > > I've been using Conkeror (based on Xulrunner/Firefox) for a while now, > and like it enough to stick with it. It's completely keyboard driven, > which I love. It's also not super stable, nor does it seem to be > actively maintained, which I don't love. If anyone has recommendations > for better keyboard-driven browsers, I'd love to hear them... Maybe Firefox with keysnail. -- Sådan en god dansk lagereddike kan man slet ikke bruge mere