From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: Adding a simple list item expands the entire simple list
 [8.3.4 (8.3.4-79-gbd4948-elpa @ c:/Users/sb/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20160606/)]
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 13:42:31 +0200
Message-ID: <8760tgdk9k.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
References: <upzcshwlqf4g.fsf@dod.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55243)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bBhJJ-0007w2-Fv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:42:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bBhJH-0004Mg-9k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:42:40 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:45285)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bBhJH-0004Mb-36
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:42:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <upzcshwlqf4g.fsf@dod.no> (Steinar Bang's message of "Fri, 10 Jun
	2016 16:42:55 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:

> What I did do:
> I pressed M-RET to insert a new item in an org simple list, with the
> other items, some containing sub lists with items, closed.
>
> What I expected to happen:
> I expected the items that were closed to stay closed, and a new item to
> be inserted.
>
> What happened instead:
> When the item was inserted, the entire simple list tree was expanded.
>
> To explain what I mean by "expanded":
>
> If I have
>  ** Item1
>   - First item of simple list
>     - Child of first item of simple list
>   - Second item of simple list
>     - Child of second item
>       - Child of child of second item
>  ** Item2
>
> and have most of the nodes closed, like this:
>  ** Item1
>   - First item of simple list...
>   - Second item of simple list...
>  ** Item2
>
> and then insert a new item into the simple list, the entire tree will
>
> open (like the first example).

Fixed. Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou