From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: subtasks causing greying of entry in agenda Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 18:54:01 +0200 Message-ID: <8760qf1ryu.fsf@saiph.selenimh> References: <87zintbk7y.fsf@skimble.plus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfVFf-0004Pc-UZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 12:54:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfVFb-0002hG-Qd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 12:54:06 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:50496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfVFb-0002go-J0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 12:54:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zintbk7y.fsf@skimble.plus.com> (Sharon Kimble's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2016 06:06:41 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Sharon Kimble Cc: org-mode-email Hello, Sharon Kimble writes: > I've discovered something this morning that puzzles me, and I can't work out how to google it! > > In my organiser file I have this task set up - > > *** TODO end of life care > DEADLINE: <2016-12-30 Fri> SCHEDULED: <2016-08-31 Wed +1d> > :PROPERTIES: > :35:00: 35:00 > :BUDGET_WEEK: 35:00 > :BUDGET_MONTH: 140:00 > :BUDGET_YEAR: 500:00 > :Effort: 500:00 > :END: > :LOGBOOK: > CLOCK: [2016-08-31 Wed 02:46]--[2016-08-31 Wed 03:47] => 1:01 > CLOCK: [2016-08-31 Wed 02:22]--[2016-08-31 Wed 02:23] => 0:01 > :END: > **** TODO death.org > **** TODO to include 'caring with dignity' > > And when its displayed in the agenda it shows as a grey line of text > which is different from other surrounding text, see attached screenshot > snippet [fn:1]. Would it be related to `org-enforce-todo-dependencies' being non-nil? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou