From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: tiny bug in ox-koma-letter.el
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:04:52 +0200
Message-ID: <8760bi3xsb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <m2zi8vcslz.fsf@polytechnique.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46086)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1e3INM-0004ml-N2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 05:04:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1e3INL-0006sF-W4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 05:04:56 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:50766)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1e3INL-0006rN-Pj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 05:04:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2zi8vcslz.fsf@polytechnique.org> (Alan Schmitt's message of
	"Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:19:36 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> writes:

> I'm exporting a letter without a to-address, and it generates a spurious
> "mbox" in the letter. I found that if I change line 708 of
> ox-koma-letter.el from "\\\\mbox{}" to "\\mbox{}" the problem goes away.
> Is this a (known) bug?

It looks like a typo. Fixed. Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou