From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Table Columns Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:11:07 +0100 Message-ID: <875zudyotw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <0b0033a4-e932-832b-3ca5-5ed7e83c05c4@gmail.com> <87k1itztbk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <158db4a6-ef20-c815-9e59-faafde175e2a@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gmzOF-0004Gc-LX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:11:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gmzOE-0006Th-Tf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:11:15 -0500 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:37713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gmzOE-0006RF-FY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:11:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <158db4a6-ef20-c815-9e59-faafde175e2a@gmail.com> (Scott Randby's message of "Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:45:41 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Scott Randby Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Scott Randby writes: > On 1/24/19 3:36 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Scott Randby writes: >> >>> I wonder this: Is there a way to tell Org to align and shrink all the >>> tables in an Org file after startup or does it have to be done on an >>> individual basis? >> >> It should be >> >> #+startup: align shrink > > This is what I had in my file originally, but when I opened the file, > there would be a lengthy delay before it actually opened. When > I removed the code from the file, it opened immediately. I don't know > what is going on. The code navigates to each table, align them, determine what columns should be shrunk, and actually shrink them. This is long if you have many tables. It is indeed better, in this case, to shrink them individually. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou