From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id mFZyCJ0UrGWNJAEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:44:45 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id mFZyCJ0UrGWNJAEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:44:45 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="prSpD/V2"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705776285; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=bl0JxSkznfTkbwMZz5v2p56/lwBZAk4C55Ztf0kVTNE=; b=jvmAr3dQJU1/4YAGnNVOjlyPJYu9iKHNOA6d5DwjSGzL86wyS8HyWNMcUoiy3elRusjFo3 +jsYTiXrSoWVppWNopGGSwJpLwyASDNhQFP83DOtr4s2NbyeBelcNcHcfYYg1AIma5stCa TAa/Xl0ob5CIY2p/RsFmpc51KVEEpCK81O+a+6DNdRcFTtYZO/BUB/DhCN4kHufmQRA2jh kGj7xFeyRZqXwSNqueIrodSt6ts2HVn631kYOnvnQtunH7NcchPpRIV9rSG5bBuE7Nd6G0 MbWj9cLLrAaUenNjO7KdVfkGIXwOe6gdJms0dRvaKIB8mCz1+6A4Jrorw15PRQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="prSpD/V2"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705776285; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gPi7wtWM3T5SseAte6ULvx3dR2dI5fxRq61+qxTlybdp5uPF/cK0WhFj9XCKig2UiUe1Fe vSFYvLoziC7g0iCWsJq5X0spusXv/MKl6wx2vzDbsOP0HHUHtQHUBZHon0HrVrChIJrh9+ 7pSYNxIL0vDwjkvQQTxsyt8EiyeDeACVvxdxQMoykAlpWcQBndfdQkDpipyQOm3UtLzI6e Xq/jEq28fBD969t0GLmaRwNFtkg3d67rmJcELS7Gdo18qfpUY2Ot21rjEgrBjlHqfk09kv 2KNCFEr4UDdM7JS/5zGzxFqqYTXmbCzWd9tio1N1dEv7i332uWn6OBojFzuz9g== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC5096AFA9 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:44:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRGJz-00068g-Ls; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 13:43:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRGJy-00068J-2S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 13:43:58 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRGJv-0005eb-5w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 13:43:57 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB82F240029 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:43:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1705776232; bh=bl0JxSkznfTkbwMZz5v2p56/lwBZAk4C55Ztf0kVTNE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=prSpD/V2xiwOITg8tBmHraTsOsnFnV+iS0OXSTeeoJ8/TlgxAG/Mb4x/CFlA1BZMo tmngn0BndFWu2XwGw/HHgvOYzWEcVWPbXlpYG/L/2Je83ETLt0T1ma01zin/IJHCif HLULhafVKYTVkwX8CeiYNy4qZwOHm960Ma7M92SiLHWvLpWx8E7hBsgYkkXe7F5G0R x+kbKRnDGKHlwFTr8c1SDZsNVgHH2LpsHwY8W0O0DWftPkCzYykz8zOSa98U7AQUp1 OjxN3oCFN2tKmQH0F1jA+qaYnDCslCRgOs9IFkuMe3fy//+UbiS+QiIgsxqDuDI4zf jteAuFmjjG4Kw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4THQP40WRjz6trs; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:43:51 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Juan Manuel =?utf-8?Q?Mac=C3=ADas?= Cc: orgmode , Max Nikulin Subject: Re: [possible patch] Remove the '\\[0pt]' string from the last line of a verse block in LaTeX export In-Reply-To: <87frysf1wf.fsf@posteo.net> References: <874jfvjo2k.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu5uv7c.fsf@localhost> <878r4tfccn.fsf@posteo.net> <87zfx9t7di.fsf@localhost> <87wmsddlw5.fsf@posteo.net> <87r0ikrt5h.fsf@localhost> <87o7dnefwo.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu1l69f.fsf@localhost> <87il3tax9a.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uwjerg.fsf@localhost> <87o7dju9vn.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uuaj11.fsf@localhost> <87h6j96xn5.fsf@posteo.net> <871qac6v5j.fsf@localhost> <87o7dgf8bb.fsf@posteo.net> <87o7dg5d8f.fsf@localhost> <87frysf1wf.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:47:08 +0000 Message-ID: <875xzn6dw3.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.94 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: EC5096AFA9 X-Spam-Score: -6.94 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: scwDI40jbFrz Juan Manuel Mac=C3=ADas writes: > Scenario B: > > lorem\\ @@latex:[ipsum]@@ =3D=3D> the problem is in the user's territory I see your point. Although I am still a bit hesitant to remove `org-latex-line-break-safe'. What would be the benefit of removing it? For now, I mostly just see that it will make the life harder for users in Scenario B. For verse blocks, AFAIU, even \\ is problematic. (Correct me if I am wrong) --=20 Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at