From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Egli Subject: Re: FR: toggling timestamps active/inactive Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:01:12 +0200 Message-ID: <874pgqr7ev.fsf@novell.com> References: <20071016141902.GB3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhvPs-0002Z9-5O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:01:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhvPq-0002Yx-0P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:01:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhvPp-0002Yu-UH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:01:33 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IhvPp-0005rS-Ff for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:01:33 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IhvPb-00026S-7B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:01:19 +0000 Received: from 77-56-57-9.dclient.hispeed.ch ([77.56.57.9]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:01:19 +0000 Received: from christian.egli by 77-56-57-9.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:01:19 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Adam Spiers writes: > By the way, I probably could have coded this in the time it took to > write the mail, but I thought that until I've sent a piece of paper to > the FSF assigning rights for code contributed to org-mode and emacs, > it would be better to let Carsten write it. Is that correct or flawed > thinking? As far as I know you do not need an assignement, i.e. all the paperwork for only a small patch. What constitutes a "small patch" I don't know. Might be answered in one of the GNU FAQs. HTH Christian