From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: switching between todo groups Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 14:59:14 +0000 Message-ID: <874pg38jel.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <7qir4l4ghj.fsf@home.net> <877il0d7gw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <874pg4bqah.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <873avor1i9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87hck38l2b.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IoJX6-0002SB-7o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 09:59:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IoJX5-0002Qp-AI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 09:59:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IoJX5-0002Qb-5e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 09:59:27 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IoJX4-0005SV-MY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 09:59:27 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1125018nfh for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 06:59:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard G. Riley's message of "Sat, 03 Nov 2007 14:43:31 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Richard G Riley writes: > At a guess internally a certain task is remembered via a task id or > something. If its not possible or not worth it, fine - no big deal. But > there is a bug in the latest in that it says there are two sets of todo > sequences but wont allow selection of the second one. Hey you mentionned in your first email that the manual explicitely said the two sets should have different keywords, so "bug" is a bit too much here :-) > If there is no current "remembering" of tasks then I'm happy to forget > I asked - it was merely a "nice to have". I should acknowledge I came across this limitation before and here is the only way I can think of to handle it: have SEQ_TODO and TYP_TODO properties and make C-S- select the right one for an entry. * TODO :PROPERTIES: :SEQ_TODO: TODO NEXT SOMEDAY | DONE CANCELED :END: * TODO :PROPERTIES: :SEQ_TODO: TODO WAITING | DONE DELEGATED :END: * TODO :PROPERTIES: :TYP_TODO: TODO Fred Isabelle Kevin WAITING | DONE :END: Would you use this? -- Bastien