From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Lundin Subject: Re: [PATCH] only display a scheduled item if it is due today or in the past Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:51:11 -0400 Message-ID: <874ohjrmf4.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <87wruwfskr.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41763 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKWN8-0005Et-Ny for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:51:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKWN3-0002WA-EJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:51:38 -0400 Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:51109) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKWN3-0002W0-Bv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:51:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Fri, 4 Jun 2010 13:17:15 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik writes: > can someone please summarize what the status of this discussion is? > > I have lost track.... As I understand it, the proposed patch hides items scheduled in the future in the weekly agenda. E.g., if it is Monday, tasks scheduled for Friday with a "STYLE=hidden" property would not appear under the Friday slot in the weekly agenda. I believe this is a perfect scenario for a skip-function. I offered an example in this post: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/24856/focus=25595 If you do decide to apply the patch, I would request that an option be added to turn off the check for a STYLE=hidden property, so as to minimize any undesired expenses in constructing the agenda. My argument is that if a test can be accommodated by current configuration options (e.g., the skip-function) and is unlikely to be invoked by a significant number of users, it should not be hard-coded. Best, Matt