From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: What license for Worg? Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:33:10 +0200 Message-ID: <874ofd19fd.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41384 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfuCh-0005XK-Ry for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:33:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfuCg-0003np-BP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:33:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:63521) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfuCg-0003nW-6r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:33:14 -0400 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so3524127wyg.0 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 05:33:13 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-org list Hi all, what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg? Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0[3] license. This solution would make it possible to take excerpts from Worg and put them into Org manual for later inclusion in Emacs, which uses GFDL 1.3 for the Emacs manual. Would any Worg contributor have objection to this? I'm open to any suggestion, please let ideas flow. Thanks, [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-licensing [2] http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html [3] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ -- Bastien