From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Dunsmore Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:34:07 -0600 Message-ID: <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57997 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pfbv9-00038k-54 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:34:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfbv7-0000Aq-Cm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:34:10 -0500 Received: from deathroller.dunsmor.com ([98.129.169.48]:47501) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfbv7-0000AV-7n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:34:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Matt Lundin's message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:02:02 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matt Lundin Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Jason Dunsmore , Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Matt Lundin writes: > Jason Dunsmore writes: > >> I made a version of the FAQ without the javascript folding: >> >> http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq-nojs.html >> http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq.html >> >> It like it better, but it's still a bit unwieldy. Maybe the FAQ just >> needs to be reorganized. See how Wikipedia does it: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ_Index >> >> Matt or Bastien, do you have an opinion on reorganizing the FAQ? > > I reorganized the FAQ into categories a year or so ago; it's remarkable > to consider how much the document has grown (thanks to the community!) > since then. > > I believe it is helpful to have the entire FAQ on one page, though I'd > agree could use some "pruning". My plan is to move some the longer > entries to documentation pages of their own, leaving behind a brief > answer along with a link to more detailed documentation. > > I'd like to get rid of the javascript folding on the FAQ. I've found > that on slower computers it can take a few seconds for the entire page > to fold, while artifacts of entries flash briefly on the screen. These changes sound great. > On this one page, I think we need a simple (non-js) table-of-contents. > Is there a way to override the hidden toc for this page only? I agree (copying Eric on this email - he might know). > I'll also see if I can work up a local export hook to add a "Back to > top" link for each entry. I think this might be unnecessary (hitting "Back", typing the "Home" key, or middle clicking at the top of the scroll bar can all already do this).