From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: what happened to the #+OPTIONS: \n:t ? Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:47:12 -0400 Message-ID: <874o6doqn3.fsf@norang.ca> References: <4D99D8E1.4060406@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55248 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6ns5-0006cU-PB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:47:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6ns2-0002w7-4s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:47:23 -0400 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:38139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6ns2-0002td-36 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:47:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4D99D8E1.4060406@gmail.com> (katepano@gmail.com's message of "Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:42:41 +0300") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: katepano Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org katepano writes: > what happen to the #+OPTIONS: \n:t ? we need it back please!!! why it > does not work???? Something happened to it? This feature was not removed intentionally. I don't use this feature so I can't verify if it works or not without more information. Please provide an example org source file for export and instructions with sample output from a previous release where it did work and what you get now so we can understand the problem. Please also provide the version of org-mode and Emacs that you are using. It is possible there's a bug that needs to be fixed. > By the way nobody responded to my message!!! > > http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg40104.html > > why? is it a stupid question or it can't be implemented? No it's not a stupid question. I don't think the functionality to export documents with a date in the filename currently exists. We all deal with the org-mode mailing list in our spare time. I expect lots of people (including me) saw your original post but nobody had anything constructive to add. Regards, Bernt