From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 01:02:38 +0200
Message-ID: <874o39v9td.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> <2011-06-24T16-30-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<8772.1308931315@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<BANLkTikqjj+voLJM4ZM_51v=k5MREA9QKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<2011-06-26T13-23-38@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8739ivw8e8.fsf@gnu.org>
	<2011-06-28T15-28-18@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<2011-06-28T18-04-12@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87sjqt6f3i.fsf@gnu.org>
	<2011-06-28T20-40-40@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51099)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QbhIR-0002XF-8J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:02:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QbhIJ-0004bR-LI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:02:19 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:53293)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QbhIJ-0004b8-1s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:02:11 -0400
Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so575981wwf.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2011-06-28T20-40-40@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> (Karl Voit's message
	of "Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:43:12 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: news1142@Karl-Voit.at
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello Karl,

Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> writes:

> Sorry when I disagree for one case:
>
> When I change each entry in my test data using «C-c .» and clicking
> on 1st of July ...
>
> ,----[ test data ]
> | <2011-06-28 Tue>
> | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w>
> | <2011-06-28 Tue -1d>
> | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w -1d>
> `----
>
> ... I end up having this:
>
> ,----[ result ]
> | <2011-07-01 Fri>
> | <2011-07-01 Fri +1w>
> | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d>
> | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d>
> `----
>
> In the last case, the repeater gets lost :-(

I cannot reproduce this.

Note that if you use the warning _before_ the repeater,
then it gets losts: 

<2011-06-28 Tue -1d +1w>

That because the warning should always be _after_ the repeater:

See section 8.3.2 "Repeated tasks" in the manual

  "the repeater should come first and the warning period last:
  `DEADLINE: <2005-10-01 Sat +1m -3d>'."

HTH,

-- 
 Bastien