From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: org-mode fontification error [6 times]
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:22:42 +0200
Message-ID: <874o1fdvzx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m1pqk418jj.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50299)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QtwvY-0000Xl-GF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:22:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QtwvT-0001TR-U3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:22:08 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:62800)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QtwvT-0001RL-IW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:22:03 -0400
Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1397458wyi.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m1pqk418jj.fsf@gmail.com> (Leo's message of "Wed, 17 Aug 2011
	21:17:52 +0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Leo,

Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:

> Just a heads-up. I saw this in my *message* buffer. I don't know how
> it happened.

Is this with emacs -Q?

I am unable to reproduce this with emacs-23.3.1 and emacs-24.0.50.1.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien