From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: example/src blocks and latex export
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 23:27:47 +0200
Message-ID: <874o1d6qi4.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <6977.1313748571@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34491)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QuWb0-00080m-KT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:27:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QuWaw-0004aJ-BX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:27:18 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:38345)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QuWaw-0004ZM-4v
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:27:14 -0400
Received: by wwf10 with SMTP id 10so2797712wwf.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6977.1313748571@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's
	message of "Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:09:31 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Nick,

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:

> * foo
>
> Verbiage to begin the paragraph
> #+begin_src shell
> get-config.py var section [section ...]
> #+end_src
> and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
>
> * bar
>
> Verbiage to begin the paragraph
> #+begin_example
> get-config.py var section [section ...]
> #+end_example
> and verbiage to end the same paragraph.

I tested your patch with the example above and I get this:

,----
| Verbiage to begin the paragraph
| 
| \lstset{language=shell}
| \begin{lstlisting}
| get-config.py var section [section ...]
| \end{lstlisting}
| 
| and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
| \section*{bar}
| \label{sec-2}
| 
| 
| Verbiage to begin the paragraph
| 
| \begin{verbatim}
| get-config.py var section [section ...]
| \end{verbatim}
| and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
`----

It looks better than the current export (less white lines) but still
has a problem with the first "and verbiage..." being indented.

Is this intentional?  Or do you want the same behavior for #+begin_src
and #+begin_example?

In overall, I think number of white lines should be the same in the Org
source file and in the LaTeX exported file, so a patch here is welcome.
But maybe I misunderstood something in Eric's reply.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien