From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 09:04:29 -0700
Message-ID: <874nx782wi.fsf@gmx.com>
References: <8739djqfkv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwhiwwr0.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87bos6pp1a.fsf@gmail.com> <8739dhnxjs.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ipmcxboo.fsf@gmail.com> <87pqgjipu8.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87y5v6x3lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwh86533.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ehwbdxk2.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55348)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1RZmgR-0001ao-1Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 11:55:27 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1RZmgP-0003L7-UR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 11:55:27 -0500
Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:45884)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1RZmgP-0003L3-Ms
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 11:55:25 -0500
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes:

> Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The attached patch entirely removes the #+name and #+results based
>> hiding.  Note that the existing "wrap" argument to the ":results" header
>> argument will wrap results in a block which allows easy tab-based result
>> hiding.
>>
>> As this is a relatively large change I hesitate to apply it outright,
>> although I do agree that it leads to simpler more consistent behavior.
>> If general consensus seems to support the application of this patch then
>> I will be happy to apply it.
>
> Has there been any more feedback on this?  
>
> Erik, is it safe to apply the patch or shall we wait more?
>

I've received no more feedback on this patch.  It should be safe as it
adds no new code but simply removes some questionable code.  I will
apply this patch now.

Best,

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/