From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Pinard)
Subject: Re: Problem at capture time
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:50:54 -0500
Message-ID: <874nw5jaz5.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca>
References: <87aa5z316j.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <87r4z9b3ia.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41443)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1RkEgo-0001LG-3W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:51:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1RkEgi-0003Lr-Bd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:51:02 -0500
Received: from 206-248-137-202.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.137.202]:55778
	helo=mercure.epsilon-ti.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1RkEgi-0003Lj-7o
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:50:56 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87r4z9b3ia.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Mon, 09 Jan 2012
	10:59:25 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes:

> Hi Fran=C3=A7ois, please be patient -- your patches are under radar,
> resending them does not help.

OK, sorry.  I do not know enough, yet, how Org works.  I sent a problem,
got a question, sent a reply which was rejected, then nothing.  A mere
short acknowledgement would have told me the message was not lost.

> What helps is to send them using git format-patch, to include a
> detailed and clean changelog entry, and to make it clear whether the
> patch is okay or for testing purpose first.  When I read your message,
> I could not be sure you were yourself confident it was the right fix.

I'm still not confident.  And I'm not pedant enough -- yet! :-) -- to
write formal patches when I'm not at least rather sure.

Besides the lack of confidence in a solution, however, the problem is
real.  The patch I sent was merely a trail for thinking.  But if nothing
else, it would do I presume.

> I will look into this later on.

Let me the one thanking you for supporting Org mode and its users, even
those like me! :-)

Fran=C3=A7ois