From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Bug: columnview times don't accumulate properly [7.8.03
 (release_7.8.03.576.gbeb02)]
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:38:37 +0100
Message-ID: <874ntf2e1u.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87boo07ltk.fsf@ed.ac.uk> <87bonxjlsi.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46849)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SBCAk-0001bp-AT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:37:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SBCAi-0004d4-PV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:37:21 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:55674)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SBCAi-0004cw-Ga
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:37:20 -0400
Received: by wgbdr1 with SMTP id dr1so1855319wgb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87bonxjlsi.fsf@gmail.com> (Myles English's message of "Fri, 16
	Mar 2012 02:56:45 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Cc: Myles English <mylesenglish@gmail.com>

Hi Myles,

Myles English <mylesenglish@gmail.com> writes:

>> i.e. the 0:10 is not being picked up in the accumulation.
>
> The attached patch produces the expected output, for the same test
> file:

I applied a slightly modified version of your patch.

Thanks a lot!

-- 
 Bastien