From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Memnon Anon Subject: Re: Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <874nrhpaud.fsf@mean.albasani.net> References: <3306.1337090863@alphaville> <5556.1337100409@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMNW-0000H8-FE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:21:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMNU-0003Ws-IV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:21:46 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMNU-0003Wm-Bw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:21:44 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMNQ-0000id-04 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:21:40 +0200 Received: from e178234187.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.234.187]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:21:39 +0200 Received: from gegendosenfleisch by e178234187.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:21:39 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs > documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in > emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case. The FSF isn't the only one caring about "Freedom". Where more than one entity exists, they are bound to disagree sometimes :). ,----[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DFSG#GFDL ] | Much documentation written by the GNU Project, the Linux Documentation | Project and others licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License | contain invariant sections, which do not comply with the DFSG. This | assertion is the end result of a long discussion and the General | Resolution 2006-001.[11] | | Due to the GFDL invariant sections, content under this license must be | separately contained in an additional "non-free" repository which is not | officially considered part of Debian. `---- hth Memnon