From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
Subject: Re: org-meta-return
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:44:47 +0800
Message-ID: <874ngsdaow.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
References: <CAMgvimHoHsk56soZNS8oj1KHUxeuaSYtqMy+Lj+K3Cc76ogk6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<5387.1361401155@alphaville> <aeuster@gmail.com>
	<CAMgvimHVM2Yh4JtGCvs9RQHpwVZpOW-kfeWR9S2BmNtsZygQ7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5951.1361405498@alphaville>
	<CAMgvimGhY2cy+5SwAoAGn+4erK9q0U2Vk41hGbX7c_9hHgwMzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALn3zogW=Foce3u7iHQvJh99xvXMO-cwmf-k2dFMPiWM==sqhg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33252)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UC6KL-0006OV-2W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 05:39:34 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UC6KJ-0006gC-Hy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 05:39:32 -0500
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38635)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UC6KI-0006fq-PK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 05:39:31 -0500
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UC6Kb-0000iT-2f
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:39:49 +0100
Received: from 114.250.122.48 ([114.250.122.48])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:39:49 +0100
Received: from eric by 114.250.122.48 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:39:49 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi John
>
> On Feb 21, 2013 10:16 PM, "42 147" <aeuster@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [continues off-topic]
>>
>> > Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard?
>>
>> A friend of mine ridicules me for being a QWERTY typist, but I have
> found
>> no empirical evidence that it is actually superior. At best, it has
> been
>> proven, in /some/ studies, to be /slightly/ superior; and from a
>> cost-benefit standpoint, /slight/ superiority according to /some/
> studies
>> (and I should add, only at extreme speeds), is not worth relearning
> how to
>> type.
>
> Colemak is a much better keyboard layout than Dvorak. I have been
> using Colemak for many years now with great pleasure.

Whoa, that's what I was looking for! Keyboard layout taped to the wall,
typing this in Colemak now. Thanks for the tip.

E