From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Rogers Subject: Re: Index of cases Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 15:17:09 -0700 Message-ID: <874n9vq7q2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <522BB194.7060705@gmail.com> <874n9wdj32.fsf@gmail.com> <522C16AD.9030102@gmail.com> <87a9jnzt5h.fsf@gmail.com> <8761ubzs8d.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VInII-0005oq-9l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:17:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VInI9-00072W-Sh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:17:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]:59401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VInI9-00072R-LB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:17:13 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w10so5445763pde.9 for ; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 15:17:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8761ubzs8d.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Sun, 08 Sep 2013 12:59:22 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Alan L Tyree Jambunathan K writes: > Jambunathan K writes: > >>> I have (I think) got them to agree to accept plain text, but I would >>> like to make it just as plain as possible. >> >> Oh, Ok. Looks like there is "exchange of ideas" between the author and >> publisher... > > In lighter vein and tongue-in-cheek sort of way... > > It seems like publishers are making you go in circles. > > You were after epub. Now you are after Word. It is only a matter of > time, before a publisher insists on an LaTex, at which point you would > have done the full-circle and savour a moment of epiphany. I'm wondering something a bit different: It sounds as if the publisher actually demands Word documents, and had never asked for anything but that. I'm swallowing hard before I say this... Why not just use Word? -- David R