From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: SUMMARY: [Feature Request] Make property-drawers exportable Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:13:50 +0200 Message-ID: <874n9914ld.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8738shvzaj.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppvkiz8b.fsf@gmail.com> <87vc5cviu6.fsf@gmail.com> <871u80imo6.fsf@gmail.com> <33429FE3-CAA5-4F58-8536-135F96CA9C11@gmail.com> <406B4BB5-5A38-44EB-AC97-DEA17644164C@gmail.com> <3EAEACD0-1B99-40B7-8A5D-AE491C9F8528@gmail.com> <87a9j115m0.fsf@gmail.com> <39CF3890-4884-4894-8670-627AC5B4E935@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VOnyV-0006Bf-UI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:13:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VOnyL-0002TK-1J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:13:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]:43548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VOnyK-0002T4-RF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:13:36 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x12so6003156wgg.8 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 05:13:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <39CF3890-4884-4894-8670-627AC5B4E935@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:08:16 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Thorsten Jolitz Carsten Dominik writes: > This sounds good to me. How about allowing also a function > as a value and that function will receive the list of properties > and do with it as it pleases. At first I thought about it but I realized that was exactly what a filter could do. Do we need to introduce redundancy here? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou