From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Move ox-koma-letter into core?
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 02:12:26 +0100
Message-ID: <874n4yuohx.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <878uueciku.fsf@gmail.com>
	<55F46D73-2430-4831-ABE9-D66AE03647E7@gmail.com>
	<874n50cdnu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwisrrv8.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<87k3dwaw98.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r482wo2k.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<87ha8yjzeb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh42wju4.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<874n4yju56.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52678)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1W5PpZ-00040n-Gb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:08:46 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1W5PpU-0008EZ-Ed
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:08:41 -0500
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45862)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1W5PpU-0008EU-88
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:08:36 -0500
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1W5PpS-0007AB-Dd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 02:08:34 +0100
Received: from 109.201.154.183 ([109.201.154.183])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 02:08:34 +0100
Received: from rasmus by 109.201.154.183 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 02:08:34 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:
>
>> So, the in-core exporters don't need to
>> be discovered, but the contrib exporters all need their own ELPA
>> package?
>
> You state it very well.
>
> In-core exporters are what people expect to be included in Emacs,
> easily activated without downloading and installing any new library.
>
> The contributed exporters are those that you would find by using
> M-x list-packages RET after adding Org ELPA.
>
> IIUC your suggestion is to keep contrib/ for things that are good
> candidates for core, and to remove non-candidate libraries.
>
> My suggestion is to get rid of the contrib/ directory and to have
> a separate Git repository with libraries available from Org ELPA.
>
> This Git repository will receive more attention that sparse code
> on repositories on the World Wild Web.
>
>> I understand that you want the repo split, I just don't understand
>> what for.
>
> To comply with the way people do use M-x list-packages RET today.

I don't have strong opinions on this, but I like the "batteries
included" way that Org is distributed at the moment, i.e. with contrib
under Org.

ATM ELPA contains little info about packages and often I need to track
down some git repo to read more about the package before installing.

–Rasmus

-- 
El Rey ha muerto. ¡Larga vida al Rey!