From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:29:33 +0100 Message-ID: <874n45vcia.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87d2j5avwl.fsf@building.gnus.org> <878utkgz36.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqh4fjfu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ppmwx8mp.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <877g938loa.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwhy4pws.fsf@moondust.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGEn-0005cY-NQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:31:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGEh-0004nW-O1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:31:09 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGEh-0004nS-Hu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:31:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGEg-0006Xr-1j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:31:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87mwhy4pws.fsf@moondust.localdomain> (N. Jackson's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:29:55 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "N. Jackson" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Lennart Borgman , 5753@debbugs.gnu.org nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) writes: > Ah, that sounds like the start of a new adventure... > > ... which went _far_ more smoothly than I expected! I am now testing > with GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 Repository revision: 116400 and Org-mode > version 8.2.5c. Yes, sorry, I meant "emacs -Q" in my recipes. I can't reproduce the bug with GNU Emacs 24.3.50.6, so it has probably been fixed between 24.3.50.1 and 24.3.50.6. I'll close it when you have a chance to build Emacs from current trunk. Thanks again for the detailed reports! -- Bastien