From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Bug: \uline produced inside \section in latex export [8.2.5h (8.2.5h-30-gdd810b-elpa @ /home/user/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20140303/)] Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:19:30 +0100 Message-ID: <874n2qo4zh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ior7qzua.fsf@slumpy.org> <87fvmbktzz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3bmoe3o.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppleiqo6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRJxD-0005En-57 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 07:19:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRJx8-0007gW-Dr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 07:19:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ppleiqo6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:27:37 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Konstantin Kliakhandler Bastien writes: > Yes, maybe there is a better fix. > > If you can find why you used \uline instead of \ul that will help > spot possible problems with the current fix, of course. > > I'm not for getting rid of the problem before we can tell for sure > why the current solution is wrong. This comes from commit 4fc03ec1fe23c6ddccffaa064a282b258ca8b6b8. See thread at: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/67741 Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou