From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: org-cite and org-citeproc Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:03:42 +0200 Message-ID: <874mp0u8n5.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87twx5hs2x.fsf@berkeley.edu> <871tk560p3.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <878uedgeuq.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yd4GK-0006Ea-0b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:03:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yd4GF-0001az-Ni for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:03:55 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56133) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yd4GF-0001at-Gy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:03:51 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yd4GD-0008FI-4k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:03:49 +0200 Received: from 102.201.133.37.dynamic.jazztel.es ([37.133.201.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:03:49 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 102.201.133.37.dynamic.jazztel.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:03:49 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Richard Lawrence writes: > I don't really know anything about the ODT format, though. My code > more-or-less blindly pastes Pandoc-generated XML into the document > during Org ODT export. Can someone who knows more about the format take > a look at the file and see if there is some subtle problem I'm not > noticing? I can't test your code 'cause I, for personal/silly reasons, refuse to spend any more dealing with compiling Haskell. That being said, my gut feeling is that you have to define the data elsewhere. For example, to add a (sub)title to a odt document the field/keyword is defined in a file different from contents.xml and will just not be printed if used in contents.xml only. Also, the bibliography is not "correct" in the sense that if it was setup in the right semantic way, it would be gray in LO, like the TOC. —Rasmus -- Bang bang