From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: problem with ox-pandoc export Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:31:02 +0200 Message-ID: <874mlm42ft.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87a8vmv5vq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pp4htpk1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878ub2k8pq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mlqjqfk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mvzg827w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86k2uioquy.fsf@example.com> <87ioa2n68f.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877fqisr7f.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnfuutyv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60533) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAn0j-0007Hp-1R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:31:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAn0f-0000Mv-27 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:31:13 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAn0e-0000Lt-Rt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:31:08 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAn0d-0002np-DF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:31:07 +0200 Received: from 90.163.164.75 ([90.163.164.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:31:07 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 90.163.164.75 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:31:07 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Note that I said "would be nice", not "need". OK. > Pandoc has quite a few export formats that we will probably never have > an export back-end for. It avoids re-inventing the wheel. And it is high quality exporter(s)? Are there any exporters in particular that we need? I don't see it as reinventing the wheel. One example, does pandoc have something like the ox filters? > Also Pandoc can export to Org syntax. It seems fair to allow the > reciprocal. I fail to see the logic here. Anyway, great if somebody wants to work on it. Thanks, Rasmus -- Governments should be afraid of their people