From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtPVF0gQSBuZXcgd2ViIGJyb3dzZXLigL0=?= Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 20:09:41 +0200 Message-ID: <874mbavel6.fsf@mbork.pl> References: <87potzvlp0.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpo7a56g.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoxKX-0005iQ-RO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 14:09:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoxKU-0007Va-Lo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 14:09:57 -0400 Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([2a01:5e00:2:52::8]:41411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoxKU-0007V9-E5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 14:09:54 -0400 In-reply-to: <87wpo7a56g.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2016-04-09, at 02:26, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Adam Porter writes: > >> Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: >> >>> https://vivaldi.com/ >>> >>> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes >>> while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? >>> Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or >>> (hopefully) configurable ones. I, for one, would like to try it out, >>> though I do not have too high hopes. >> >> It looks interesting, but it's not free software, so I have no interest >> myself. Firefox/Iceweasel has been serving me well since before it was >> Firefox, and Pentadactyl has been my primary UI to it for a long time. I >> don't feel like Mozilla is taking it in a good direction anymore, but if it >> ever gets too bad, there's Iceweasel, and there's Pale Moon (which has >> committed to "classic" Firefox extension APIs and UI), and there are other >> alternatives like Conkeror, uzbl, etc. >> >> Even if you don't care about free software, Vivaldi is made by former Opera >> devs, so how do we know they aren't just repeating a cycle? It could go the >> same direction Opera went and need to be rebooted again. As long as it's >> proprietary, that's a risk its users will always face. > > I've been using Conkeror (based on Xulrunner/Firefox) for a while now, > and like it enough to stick with it. It's completely keyboard driven, > which I love. It's also not super stable, nor does it seem to be > actively maintained, which I don't love. If anyone has recommendations > for better keyboard-driven browsers, I'd love to hear them... eww ;-) But seriously, I'd also like to hear them! Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University