From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: abbreviations of link-type "file"
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:32:18 +0200
Message-ID: <874m6e1n8d.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
References: <423A612C-90D6-4E92-9221-65E71E8E0C05@aiguphonie.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42002)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bbP79-0006Gt-0g
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 05:32:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bbP74-0001jQ-4R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 05:32:22 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:33044)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bbP73-0001jM-UK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 05:32:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <423A612C-90D6-4E92-9221-65E71E8E0C05@aiguphonie.com>
	(mc@aiguphonie.com's message of "Sat, 20 Aug 2016 21:51:27 +0300")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: mc <mc@aiguphonie.com>
Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>

Hello,

mc <mc@aiguphonie.com> writes:

> As we talk about link abbreviations, another issue might add some useful information:
>
> links of link-type "file" (e.g. "file+new-link"), if follow via an
> abbreviation, is not parsed correctly:

I suggest to avoid using so called "application" links, i.e.,
type+application syntax as it may be ditched at some point. You can
define a new link type instead, e.g., "newlink" or "applink".

In any case, could you provide an ECM?

Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou