From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: jumping from Agenda/Timeline to .org source file Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:55:45 +0100 Message-ID: <874lyq52ou.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87fuio115w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87a88u3ocv.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpB5R-0004Gf-LD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 05:55:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpB5Q-00081U-Fx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 05:55:49 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:46517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpB5Q-00080j-AC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 05:55:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Alan Schmitt's message of "Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:34:05 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Alan Schmitt Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > Hello Eric, > > On 2017-03-09 07:23, Eric S Fraga writes: > >> On Wednesday, 8 Mar 2017 at 12:55, Alan Schmitt wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> I would like to use `org-agenda-goto', but without splitting the frame. >>> In other words, I want to destination to be the one of >>> `org-agenda-goto', but the window handling to be the one of >>> `org-agenda-switch-to'. >> >> You could "advice" (advise in English :-) org-agenda-goto to delete other >> windows after invocation? >> >> Or, create a new function which invokes org-agenda-goto and then >> delete-other-windows and bind that to the key you want? > > Yes, these are solutions. I was just trying to understand why the > functions had different behaviors. I tried the same, without much success. I think we could factor out both functions into a single one with a control argument. Any taker? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou