From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-agenda tag completion works with ido
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:14:05 -0400
Message-ID: <874lugdx1u.fsf@kyleam.com>
References: <CAPrg3HBYSkjj7ev_YR0kciOWhSaF+Ui85tXH4GVtWo1-Frs1rQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87bmopdkcy.fsf@kyleam.com>
	<CAPrg3HARqWPav4FVLfE2qfjsG8PQx6_dbFenZVanhxBbB5rV7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<878tjsdxl4.fsf@kyleam.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44878)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1dVicu-0000n2-Qi
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:14:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1dVicp-00073H-UU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:14:12 -0400
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54121
	helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1dVicp-00072j-Ok
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:14:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <878tjsdxl4.fsf@kyleam.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nathaniel Flath <flat0103@gmail.com>
Cc: org-mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:

[...]

> Or maybe the difference comes from an ido version mismatch.  (I'm
> using the ido from Emacs 25.2 and ido-ubiquitous checked out at
> v3.14-4-ga1c2965.)
>
> As it stands, I can't reproduce the problem described in your commit
> message.

I upgraded to the latest ido-ubiquitous (v3.16-67-g7b71365).  I'm still
unable to reproduce the issue.

-- 
Kyle