Re: Documentation references to htmlize and htmlize vs. htmlfontify

[Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>]

Hello,

Tim Landscheidt <tim@tim-landscheidt.de> writes:

> Finally, Emacs already ships with htmlfontify.  On (non-Org)
> files, I see small, but not significant differences between
> it and htmlize.  Are there features that only htmlize of-
> fers?  Otherwise it would be very convenient to replace
> calls to htmlize with a wrapper that tests if the user set
> some configurable variable org-htmlize-function (and calls
> that), otherwise tries to load htmlize and use that, and
> falls back to using htmlfontify.  Glancing at the code, org-
> mode seems to use htmlize-region (with (point-min) (point-
> max), but on narrowed buffers) which htmlfontify does not
> offer, but it is unclear to me whether that would kill 100 %
> of all use cases or only some.  (If it works out of the box
> with htmlfontify for the most common ones, IMHO that would
> be preferable to the current situation where it does not
> work at all unless one installs htmlize.)

FWIW, I'm in favour of replacing entirely htmlize with htmlfontify,
since the latter is bundled with Emacs.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou