From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Welle Subject: Re: How to make agenda generation faster Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 08:48:31 +0200 Message-ID: <874ldtkmgw.fsf@luisa.c0t0d0s0.de> References: <87h8hy1ho5.fsf@mbork.pl> <87d0skj44p.fsf@luisa.c0t0d0s0.de> <87o9c18t7f.fsf@mbork.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAUm1-0001Pa-Ek for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 02:48:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAUlx-00048J-L0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 02:48:41 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:50539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAUlv-000478-HT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 02:48:37 -0400 Received: from stella.c0t0d0s0.de ([194.95.66.1]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3igT-1fsxzF1fXd-00rEPn for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 08:48:32 +0200 Received: from stella.c0t0d0s0.de ([194.95.66.1]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3igT-1fsxzF1fXd-00rEPn for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 08:48:32 +0200 Received: from Stella (stella.c0t0d0s0.de [192.168.42.1]) by stella.c0t0d0s0.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0CC18120A for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 08:48:31 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87o9c18t7f.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:03:48 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Marcin Borkowski writes: > On 2018-10-08, at 09:20, Michael Welle wrote: [...] >> Well, on my laptop the initial agenda run takes about 7s or so (150 >> agenda files) using the current day/week agenda ("a"). All subsequent >> (after loading the files) agenda runs are fast (split second I would >> say). I had some performance issues in the past caused by SCM. Emacs >> tried to check if every file is checked out in the latest version. That >> slowed down the process a lot (starting 150 mercurial processes in >> sequential order, checking results, etc.). The initial run doesn't >> bother me much. I bound the initial agenda run to an idle timer at Emacs >> start. > > Interesting. I did not notice such differences between the first and > subsequent runs. I thought that behaviour is natural, scanning dirs for files and opening them is a costly operation. But a week ago I changed from rotating rust to solid state disks and that behaviour did not change much. I expected a speed up, but mee. Regards hmw