Re: [PATCH] Faulty logic in org-cmp-tag/alpha

[Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>]

Hello,

Carlos Pita <carlosjosepita@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> there is a problem in this kind of logic:
>
>     (cond ((not ta) +1)
>       ((not tb) -1)
>       ((string-lessp ta tb) -1)
>       ((string-lessp tb ta) +1))))
>
> in that when both ta and tb are nil then they are arbitrarily sorted.
> Since the agenda sorting strategy is lexicographic this logic
> virtually invalidates any strategy that puts tag or alpha first, v.g.
> '(tag-up priority-down).
>
> I've attached a patch returning nil when both ta and tb are nil so as
> to fallback to the next sorting criterion without favoring lhs nor
> rhs.

Applied. Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou