From: Kyle Meyer <email@example.com>
To: Mario Frasca <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: `with` as a list.
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 00:19:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
Mario Frasca writes:
> On 30/05/2020 16:29, Mario Frasca wrote:
>> I hope to be back soon with a single commit...
> one doubt. what's the point of having me squash all in a single commit,
> when I do not have write access to the repository?
To provide me or another committer with a polished, final state to
apply, along with a commit message that follows the convention mentioned
at <https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html> and ideally explains
why the change should be applied. (The rationale you sent in your first
message could be adapted for this.) You've been sending a diff,
presumably from the point you branched off of to the tip of your branch.
In that case, you're already presenting each iteration you've sent as
one change; it just lacks a commit message.
Just for clarity: In this case, I think the change proposed so far makes
sense to present as a single commit. I'm not claiming that in general a
patch series should be reduced to _one_ commit.
> if we were on github, I would be working on a pull request, which
> would have a description and a title, and contain several commits.
If I were reviewing a pull request from you, I would still request that
you not pile fixup commits on top and that you instead rewrite/polish
the series to address feedback. People have strong opinions in both
directions on this, and I hope this thread doesn't derail into a
discussion of those. My point is just that this workflow is not unique
to mailing list patch submission.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-22 16:07 `with` as a list Mario Frasca
2020-05-28 13:34 ` [PATCH] [FEATURE] " Mario Frasca
2020-05-30 6:22 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-05-30 14:23 ` Mario Frasca
2020-05-30 14:38 ` Mario Frasca
2020-05-30 20:23 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-05-30 21:29 ` Mario Frasca
2020-05-31 20:18 ` Mario Frasca
2020-06-01 0:19 ` Kyle Meyer [this message]
2020-06-01 1:47 ` Mario Frasca
2020-06-01 2:31 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-06-03 15:09 ` Mario Frasca
2020-06-03 15:13 ` Bastien
2020-06-03 15:18 ` Mario Frasca
2020-06-03 15:29 ` Bastien
2020-06-03 17:08 ` Mario Frasca
2020-06-03 22:15 ` Mario Frasca
2020-06-03 15:25 ` Mario Frasca
2020-06-03 15:30 ` Bastien
2020-05-30 16:01 ` Mario Frasca
2020-05-30 20:25 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-05-30 21:36 ` Mario Frasca
2020-05-31 0:36 ` Kyle Meyer
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).