From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id cHoULk6J31+HdwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 17:26:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 8K/vKU6J31/hCQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 17:26:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C6FE940366 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 17:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42560 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr2Tc-0001Uk-Hw for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:26:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr2T7-0001RF-Lw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:26:05 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49579) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr2T3-0007qR-Pb; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:26:04 -0500 Received: from [37.167.79.36] (port=10680 helo=guerry) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kr2T2-0001CM-Pi; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:26:01 -0500 Received: by guerry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BAA411A60DB3; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:25:57 +0100 (CET) From: Bastien To: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: did behaviour of RET change again? Organization: GNU References: <87im8z1cxq.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:25:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87im8z1cxq.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:06:09 +0000") Message-ID: <874kkgie3e.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Emacs Org mode mailing list Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.82 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0C6FE940366 X-Spam-Score: -1.82 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: MkpyllI9cEvy Hi Eric, Eric S Fraga writes: > Just a quick heads-up: > > I have just installed org from git (a few hours ago) and now it seems > that RET no longer indents. Is this intentional? I've not closely followed this, sorry. I see something wrong right now: RET after a headline should only try to indent below the beginning of the headline with org-adapt-indentation is t, but not nil or headline-data. For now, when org-adapt-indentation is headline-data, RET still indents. I will see how to fix this. Also, I'm thinking of using headline-data as the new default for the org-adapt-indentation option. WDYT? I know Kevin as a good overview of the whole topic, maybe he can also advise about what should be done here. Best, -- Bastien