Re: cgit and merge commit

[Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>]

Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:

>> Should we then report a bug to cgit mailing list?
>
> I do not have particular opinion. I rarely use web UI for git and mostly 
> for blame. I prefer to do it with local clone. I have never read cgit 
> docs. Perhaps it may be more apparent that it is a merge commit.
>
> Anyway at first I would ask the savannah team. E.g. vanilla debbugs 
> instance is significantly more convenient than the GNU ones and the 
> changes in the latter are intentional. Mhonarc (list archive) at 
> lists.debian.org has better configuration than at lists.gnu.org as well. 
> So there might be specific of particular instance.

I asked savannah people, and they pointed out that the commits where, in
fact, listed in the logs. Just at their original creating dates - much
earlier than the merge commit date and further down into the logs.

So, it was mostly my oversight from the very beginning - nothing was
lost during the merge process.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>