From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8ByzA5NRdGUpYQEAauVa8A:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:37:55 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8ByzA5NRdGUpYQEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:37:55 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E835BBC7 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 12:37:54 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=JL1rrlo4; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1702121875; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=voVmwlwX/y5Gvl5PG+V08fQ7c2FAFuwIG6FvRqDo/Jw=; b=CAZfHHB0tsRrwXpmHWNx5cT//Gn4numaVR2BJWjxUKI+F9OwVLG9bnEhMiTVWD0coMQeLg EeH/KH5bwZkUUHcQTZ1l1soltbsvGZoJuKtpDdtuiEgIgFhncpdjPTkNsDg/h+EAwpMRS7 JJhs/ZUVOobJYNQTSK/cfneCexTddMZ6O4XHDSpJHVc1Ti4qKB7FqZP4HB1CCLT6f8Vmz+ z+EP4uR0z+8TIFDGcxxGiqMroGcanJDkYof+RX2IMo5o9Jkfa+zwc4ldKZV4kmR4F8cDc/ t5gi7sg3Pa3r0nkP2xuqL+qnOGNNGCZZ4qyX1sM+qc5E2pNn1HYU9O313HFRpg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1702121875; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ojy+7nTf2Gi15BZ2QB+VUpI+gLIsAXythkOtRmlUOd7RzJZGK11bzTZa9o4NZl5k/E689t ShBAeK5CMd4ylvnte87eo16/2FGHTM+NYv8VpsnelNC9+e9HQK7Q9OnJLWtIjKjVtOUW5V yF1+fxI4RVRKSCgyqRqzRaTJ4n6KLzanQMw3jFxPSimoLyJ1a6xuix8zhCr+m9cKTjKhwN CdcFnBZnnlVMT1Bnt2VIt0DQfWaZC8kfUL2fk10B7v0mNqZx1ZlloXAOBJj0QTHKpQLiFV L1Sm691CVN09qVf9VyylWRtW6xi0rxCRCRX/shzyE2dliWO20g7WX7BnpS3SOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=JL1rrlo4; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBvdK-0003xj-PL; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 06:36:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBvdI-0003xT-NN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 06:36:32 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBvdE-0003WW-FK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 06:36:32 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A23240103 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 12:36:26 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1702121786; bh=legTLHJrPHfi4Gt/M2hp/VHdox05MCogs97Br2rYCzw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=JL1rrlo4xemsoBFnBCedmp4gfzCpGGDP1VR1VXfXqDo1MIEt9+1uQci4QiR41ab+j RrPpnadbsIzQMYUS9IZFoI4gJv1pddsQy1tKlzQ1gz7YHQQJazbG7fHMxoSNcYB9BT szqgN5BoZIsP1GAav3EH0GBYbmcQD+TimUBMEbVth+iYlFitHcBDxaIsodA3dI9qbe 6LVrW28gaNL0c/hPRUz7HQHUHbQmH2jld56l3jm144t92NahSzptJVxQEKDSQAjvwr S8EcNYhJK5l0TgugdPltk3tt/uLeRGlCaP6mHChaIdB7C8o+K+MeQIQXlQR1MQ0DLf if9TNgasVlDZg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4SnQvF42ytz9rxN; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 12:36:25 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Morgan.J.Smith@outlook.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, 58131@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: [FR] Allow flattened imenu index (was: [PATCH] Add new option 'org-imenu-flatten') In-Reply-To: <835y17y5qu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87plzgbalt.fsf@localhost> <87msujskxg.fsf@localhost> <835y17y5qu.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:39:33 +0000 Message-ID: <874jgrsiyy.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.31 X-Spam-Score: -2.31 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A8E835BBC7 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: WoTpv42zijwY Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I am wondering if it makes more sense to add this "flatten" option >> globally into imenu instead. > > I'm not sure I understand what you are asking. As we don't seem to > have an active maintainer of imenu on board, more details are needed > to understand the request. Of course, patches are even more welcome. Normally, `imenu' supports nested menus, when users select the target location in steps, like item3 -> item3.1 -> ... What is proposed is to list all the sub-menus together, as an option, so that the users can choose, for example, item.3.1 directly, without going through parent item3. > Also, should this be a new bug report? the one mentioned in the CC is > already closed and archived. Maybe. I was just not sure how I can create a new bug report, while still replying to Org mode feature request. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at