Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Support attr_html in source code and fixed-width blocks

[Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247@gmail.com>]

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> Commits under similar names are:
>
> Suhail 96eb9f0b4 * piem/s/org-lint-add-function-to-removeJun6 org-lint: Add function to remove checker(s)
> ...
>
> I assume that 96eb9f0b4 is yours.
> It has 9 LOC.

Yes.

> ~6LOC remaining until aproximate 15LOC limit we can accept without
> copyright assignment.

Noted, thanks.  With comments, documentation etc. this will go over the
limit, so I won't be sending any revisions to the patch.

>> 2. When implementing such refactoring changes, which lines are counted?
>
> More or less all lines, except things like blank lines, query replace,
> or copy-pasted code (or, in other words, trivial changes)

Understood.

>> From a feasibility perspective, I suspect it might be better for you (or
>> someone else who's signed the FSF copyright assignment paperwork) to
>> take on the work of applying changes that are similar in spirit to the
>> patch.
>
> Maybe, but that's a subject of my time and priorities.
> This particular bug/feature request will not be high in the priority
> list. Unless we get more users jumping to this thread and asking for
> #+ATTR_HTML support.

Understandable.

-- 
Suhail