From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: Display missing/overlapping clock ranges
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:09:38 -0400
Message-ID: <8739l79rgt.fsf@norang.ca>
References: <io4gdf$oq2$1@dough.gmane.org> <87ei56yv2y.fsf@gmail.com>
	<878vvdj1y6.fsf@norang.ca>
	<1598DF88-B3E8-4502-956F-3A98113EA5BE@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34391)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1QE8SM-0007iA-Kw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:11:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1QE8SL-0001tu-Rn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:11:10 -0400
Received: from mho-04-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.74]:35384
	helo=mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1QE8SL-0001sA-Pr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:11:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1598DF88-B3E8-4502-956F-3A98113EA5BE@gmail.com> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:30:37 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@diplan.de>, emacs-orgmode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Paul Mead <paul.d.mead@gmail.com>

Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:

> these are pretty good ideas, and since it is a holiday, I have some time,
> so I have tried an implementation and just pushed it to the master.
>
>
> Testing and feedback would be much appreciated.
> Also, it is not really useful to use this on a filtered agenda view,
> but testing of this would be appreciated as well.

Thanks Carsten!  I'll take a closer look at this on Tuesday when I'm
back in the office.  My initial reaction is it's *awesome*!  :)

Best Regards,
Bernt