From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: example/src blocks and latex export
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:28:51 -0600
Message-ID: <8739gubov0.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <6977.1313748571@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<874o1d6qi4.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33060)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1QvClZ-0004Xq-G4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:29:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1QvClX-00065h-P8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:29:01 -0400
Received: from mail-iy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:50744)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1QvClX-00065W-Hl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:28:59 -0400
Received: by iyn15 with SMTP id 15so7522675iyn.6
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <874o1d6qi4.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Fri, 19 Aug 2011
	23:27:47 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes:

> Hi Nick,
>
> Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:
>
>> * foo
>>
>> Verbiage to begin the paragraph
>> #+begin_src shell
>> get-config.py var section [section ...]
>> #+end_src
>> and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
>>
>> * bar
>>
>> Verbiage to begin the paragraph
>> #+begin_example
>> get-config.py var section [section ...]
>> #+end_example
>> and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
>
> I tested your patch with the example above and I get this:
>
> ,----
> | Verbiage to begin the paragraph
> | 
> | \lstset{language=shell}
> | \begin{lstlisting}
> | get-config.py var section [section ...]
> | \end{lstlisting}
> | 
> | and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
> | \section*{bar}
> | \label{sec-2}
> | 
> | 
> | Verbiage to begin the paragraph
> | 
> | \begin{verbatim}
> | get-config.py var section [section ...]
> | \end{verbatim}
> | and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
> `----
>
> It looks better than the current export (less white lines) but still
> has a problem with the first "and verbiage..." being indented.
>
> Is this intentional?  Or do you want the same behavior for #+begin_src
> and #+begin_example?
>
> In overall, I think number of white lines should be the same in the Org
> source file and in the LaTeX exported file, so a patch here is welcome.
> But maybe I misunderstood something in Eric's reply.
>

I had misread Nicks first email and thus my reply made no sense.  I've
applied this patch as it seems to be a definite improvement.

Thanks! -- Eric

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/