From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: Difficulty with repeater timestamps in agenda Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:45:58 -0500 Message-ID: <8739by3gy1.fsf@norang.ca> References: <1325453848.21620.YahooMailNeo@web161302.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <87zke72d9l.fsf@norang.ca> <3252.1325468055@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhYqc-0005A5-4j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:46:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhYqa-00085w-FX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:46:06 -0500 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:15235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhYqa-00085s-7s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:46:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3252.1325468055@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message of "Sun, 01 Jan 2012 20:34:15 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Christian Prothmann , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Nick Dokos writes: > Bernt Hansen wrote: > >> Christian Prothmann writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am relatively new to org-mode (7.8.02). After working with org-mode >> > for several weeks, I came to realize that none of the repeater >> > timestamps or tasks (+1d, 1w or +1m) show in the agenda timeline >> > unless there is another "one-time" timestamp for the same day. >> > Basically, I am not able to see them? Please advise. >> > >> > Thanks & Happy New Year to all, >> >> Hi Christian, >> >> Please show us an example of a repeater entry that you think should show >> up in your agenda so we can help diagnose your issue. >> > > The OP is talking about the "timeline" in the agenda (C-c a L). This has > been discussed before on the mailing list and it does indeed have the > problem the OP mentions. The upshot however (afaik) is that "timeline" > is considered obsolete functionality. There may be different ways to > accomplish what the OP wants however. See e.g. the extensive thread at > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/39368 Ah, thanks for the clarification Nick. I don't use the timeline at all and didn't get a clue :) Regards, Bernt