From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Pinard)
Subject: Collaborative edition?
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:48:31 -0500
Message-ID: <8739akros0.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52343)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1RvWEg-00057F-GA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:48:47 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1RvWEa-0004Lg-Se
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:48:38 -0500
Received: from 206-248-137-202.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.137.202]:49642
	helo=mercure.epsilon-ti.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1RvWEa-0004LR-PA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:48:32 -0500
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi, Org friends.

Let me send this message in "chat mode", nothing important in here! :-)

Before Org mode, I was using a mix of Tomboy and Workflowy.  Tomboy is a
note taking application, which I used under GNOME, and Workflowy.com is
an outlining Web service.  I used and liked both intensely, each is full
of various virtues.

There is one thing in Workflowy that I miss a bit in Org mode, and this
is the capability of collaborative edition.  I once much used it with
some of my co-workers.  I presume such things have been discussed to
death already on this mailing list?  Did some consensus emerged?

My question is a rhetorical one, as I'm pretty sure my co-workers are
never going to switch to Emacs, and anyway, collaboration is managed
differently for the time being.  Yet, I'm curious, so my question.  And
who knows, ideas sometimes germinate while being exchanged! :-)

Fran=C3=A7ois