From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dev] Implement "ref" link types
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:51:05 +0100
Message-ID: <8739a62upy.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87vcn2vgq7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<E2A59F3A-458B-44D7-B794-C2429FD18F9D@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38701)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1RzHUJ-00073q-94
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:52:20 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1RzHUI-00035v-DU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:52:19 -0500
Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:40213)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1RzHUI-00035r-7s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:52:18 -0500
Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so3284999wgb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:52:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E2A59F3A-458B-44D7-B794-C2429FD18F9D@gmail.com> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:10:59 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:

> Why are you saying it is not a full replacement for \ref{something}?

There are still a few limitations. For example, you cannot reference
a precise list item since items do not accept affiliated keywords.

> It is better than that because it will work in more backends....

Yes, this is a big advantage.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou