From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: Org, Org-mode, Orgmode, Org Mode Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:00:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87396e6njr.fsf@googlemail.com> References: <87fwaeyvxl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bol26q5u.fsf@googlemail.com> <87bol2yruc.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sal6E-0006yu-JF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 05:58:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sal6B-0005Hc-Pc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 05:58:22 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53933) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sal6B-0005HN-In for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 05:58:19 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sal67-0000R8-Np for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 11:58:15 +0200 Received: from e178055055.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.55.55]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 11:58:15 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by e178055055.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 11:58:15 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > So my question still stands, which variant is the preferred one if any > and should we work to standardize it across all documentation? It would indeed be very usefull to have that written in stone once and forever, I personally like Org-mode best. -- cheers, Thorsten