From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: make test on Mac
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:23:22 +0200
Message-ID: <873946ofmt.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <E537AB11-4D10-4BFA-AFEF-A4CEF5955A4D@univie.ac.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55037)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SwZp5-0001Cb-8q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:22:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SwZp1-0002eO-12
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:22:51 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:55266)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SwZp0-0002eI-Qf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:22:46 -0400
Received: by wibhq4 with SMTP id hq4so3022259wib.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 07:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E537AB11-4D10-4BFA-AFEF-A4CEF5955A4D@univie.ac.at> (Neuwirth
	Erich's message of "Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:10:10 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Neuwirth Erich <erich.neuwirth@univie.ac.at>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Erich,

yes, it does make sense to report such errors as they may be related to
your architecture/installation -- and developers cannot test all possible
architectures/installations.

Neuwirth Erich <erich.neuwirth@univie.ac.at> writes:

> I am regularly building org mode on my Mac.
> I do not pretend to bean experienced Emacs programmer, but I am will it to help if I can contribute.
>
> This is what I get when I run
> make test
> on the current source.
>
> Ran 314 tests, 307 results as expected, 7 unexpected (2012-08-01 16:06:02+0200)
> 5 expected failures

I can't reproduce this on my Emacs.

GNU Emacs 24.1.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10)
 of 2012-07-26 on myhost

> 7 unexpected results:
>    FAILED  ob-fortran/command-arguments
>    FAILED  ob-fortran/fortran-var-program
>    FAILED  ob-fortran/input-var
>    FAILED  ob-fortran/list-var
>    FAILED  ob-fortran/list-var-from-table
>    FAILED  ob-fortran/preprosessor-var
>    FAILED  ob-fortran/simple-program

Hopefully someone using a Mac can try against latest git head and run a 
make test to confirm.

> Does it make any sense for the developers that I mail this? 
> Should I send more or is this useless information?

You should test what is your version of MacOSX and Emacs.

M-x emacs-version RET

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien